Skip to content
Nerva PressNERVA PRESS
Editorial standards

What we hold ourselves to.

Practical psychology carries responsibility. These are the standards applied to every Nerva Press manuscript.

  1. 01

    Evidence-informed content

    Our books draw on established psychological approaches and credible research. We describe what an approach is generally intended to support, not what it will do for a particular reader.

  2. 02

    Responsible health language

    We avoid diagnostic language, promises of recovery, and framing that implies treatment. Educational writing is kept distinct from clinical advice.

  3. 03

    Transparent limitations

    Where evidence is mixed, developing, or context-dependent, we say so rather than simplifying it into certainty.

  4. 04

    References where appropriate

    When a claim rests on specific research or an established framework, we point readers to the source.

  5. 05

    Professional review when relevant

    When a manuscript addresses clinical or safety-sensitive topics, Nerva Press may seek independent review from an appropriately qualified professional.

  6. 06

    No guaranteed outcomes

    We do not publish outcome guarantees, cures, or timelines for change.

  7. 07

    Education is not treatment

    Our books are educational. They are not a substitute for diagnosis, therapy, medical advice, or individualized mental-health treatment.

  8. 08

    Respectful neurodiversity language

    We write about neurodivergent readers as people with different processing, not as problems to be corrected.